Why do they make it so hard?

It’s so unnecessary 😕

My eldest daughter had both good and bad experiences during her university years. Well, now it’s my younger daughter’s turn to dive into this crazy adventure.

Maddy arranged her 2nd year accommodation with friends she met in her 1st year. I had heard there were a few things they had to bring to the attention of the agents, including where they said they’d had to take legal advice (which was true – guess who from 😊) in order for them to listen!

I was looking forward to seeing her new place when I went to help her move in some stuff she didn’t need at home over the summer.

It was in a row of terraced houses. It had a lovely bay window to the front room but this was overshadowed by the pile of rubbish in the small front garden, which should have been cleared weeks ago.

But wait, it got worse. The front door didn’t even open all the way, and the flooring in the hallway was as wobbly as a carnival ride.

And don’t even get me started on the shared spaces. Boxes and random stuff were strewn all over the lounge and kitchen area. It was like walking through a maze of chaos!

But then, I stumbled upon the grand finale— the freezer.

Brace yourself for this one. I opened it, and what did I find?

An arctic wonderland! I’m talking mountains of ice, stalactites, and stalagmites.

I kid you not, you couldn’t even open the only drawer.  It was like a scene straight out of an Ice Age movie! 📽

This was a property that was supposed to have had a deep clean after the previous tenants moved out, or so the lease says.

It’s not difficult to treat people right, whether it is your tenants or your customers, so it baffles me why this happens.

Hopefully, by the time she moves in for the new term, it will be a different story. I’ll let you know.

If a claim looks too good to be true…

… it probably is!

You know how it is – we all want to save those hard-earned pennies on our energy bills, especially at the moment.

So when a company promises magical savings with their new product, people were naturally going to take notice.

“Lower your bills. Reduce your energy use. Protect yourself from price increases” they said, claiming you could save up to a whopping 20% on your electricity bills with their Home Voltage Optimiser.

That sounds too good to be true, doesn’t it?

Well, you’re right!

Fortress Energy found itself in hot water with the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) for making such bold claims without solid evidence to back them up.

There was an attempt to dazzle with some technical jargon about voltage fluctuations and how their nifty transformer gadget could prevent overloading electrical items, thereby saving you energy, carbon, and money!

But the ASA isn’t interested in magic tricks – they want hard facts, cold numbers, and real evidence!

Fortress provided industry guides, but these talked about voltage optimisation in general, not their specific product. They also cited a case study, but this was the result of just one test on one household.

And although this showed energy savings, there were no details on how the test was carried out, which meant there may have been many other factors, such as other energy-saving devices in the house or changes to the occupants’ energy habits that could have led to the savings.

Perhaps they turned off the lights when they left a room, or they unplugged all devices before going to bed!

You can probably see why this failed to convince the ASA.

When it comes to making big claims, you can’t rely on a single case study and a sprinkle of jargon. The ASA want all the info and data to back those claims up.

Otherwise, you will be on the wrong side of the ASA, and trust me, despite having no powers to fine you, that’s not where you want to be!

Win or lose 🏆

There are always lessons to learn!

Did you watch the Wimbledon men’s final? 🎾

I’ve always wanted to go, but I missed out big time this year.

The clash between the old guard, Novak Djokovic, and the young pretender, Carlos Alcaraz, was epic! It was like a masterclass in top-notch tennis, all condensed into five thrilling sets.

I thought it might be game over for him after that first set where Carlos lost 6-1.

But boy did he bounce back! He took the second set to a tiebreak, and suddenly, the momentum shifted.

After saving some set points, he won the 2nd and then the 3rd.

But then it was Novak’s turn to fight back, taking the 4th set and setting up a last set shootout.

And after 4 hours and 42 mins, Carlos triumphed, denying his opponent a record-equalling win.

Now there was a lot of talk before the match about the 2 players.

Novak, the defending champ, was aiming for his fifth consecutive and eighth Wimbledon title.

On the other side, Carlos, the youngest world number 1 at just 20 years old, was hungry for his second title. The stakes were high.

There were some magnificent shots from both players, and as the match went on it was evident that they shared one essential skill.

They learnt from every point played. Whether they won or lost, they took it all in, adapting their strategies and outplaying each other at crucial moments.

That’s one thing that I share with both Novak and Carlos.

While I may not possess their extreme prowess on the tennis court 🤣, I do share their constant drive to learn and adapt.

It’s all about providing the best outcomes for my clients, just like they fought for every point on that court.

Is this a case of 3 strikes and you’re out…

… Ladbrokes will be hoping not!

Have you been keeping up with the rollercoaster ride of Ladbrokes and their gambling ads

You may remember my previous mention of the ASA’s updated rules to keep betting and gambling ads away from the under-18s.

Part of these rules includes avoiding any association with youth culture by not using people or characters that appeal to those under 18 in ads.

This may seem straightforward enough, but when brands like Ladbrokes manage to stumble not once, not twice, but thrice since these rules came into effect last October, maybe they’re not as simple as first it seems.

⚽ First off, we had a football fiasco.

Ladbrokes sent out a promotional tweet right when the rules kicked in, raising interest from the ASA. The tweet posed the question, “Can these big summer signings make the question marks over their performances go away?”

The video embedded in the tweet featured Premier League footballers Philippe Coutinho, Jesse Lingard, and Kalidou Koulibaly, all surrounded by question marks, and the “Ladbrokes” logo.

Ladbrokes claimed they did everything to prevent those under 18 from seeing the ad, using their own targeting and age-gating techniques.

But there’s a problem here: Twitter allows self-verification, so Ladbrokes could not prevent children who had lied about their age from seeing the tweet.

🥊 Then we had a boxing blunder.

The ASA considers boxing an adult-oriented sport with a low appeal to under-18s. But when you pair this with a big social media following, the problems start!

A promoted tweet featured Jake Paul, a guy known more for his YouTube shenanigans and a whopping social media following of around 65 million people. Mr Paul turned his hand to boxing a few years back, and the tweet followed his defeat by Tommy Fury. It included a poll asking what’s next for him.

Paul’s under 18 following is only around 3 million across all the social media platforms, and he has no followers on Twitter. However, the guidance suggests that if a sportsperson has a limited following among under-18s but is widely recognised for their social media presence and media profile, this makes them more likely to attract the younger crowd.

And to make matters worse, Jake Paul was a child actor, appearing on children’s TV! No surprise then the complaint was upheld.

⚽ But wait, there’s more! Football strikes again.

Two promoted tweets featuring Premier League managers Eddie Howe, David Moyes, Frank Lampard, Brendan Rodgers, and Gary O’Neil caught the ASA’s attention.

These managers are well-known to football followers, especially fans of the clubs they managed, which include children.

And Premier League football managers are considered high-risk, as they tend to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

But guess what? Ladbrokes, once again, went with Twitter, relying on self-verified customer sign-ups. As they’d seen in the first case, this approach doesn’t exclude a young audience with the accuracy required for these types of ads.

Some people don’t worry about the ASA, well they can’t fine you can they, but the effect their rulings can have on your reputation can’t be underplayed.

The boxing one was unfortunate I think, but with 2 complaints involving football stars, I think Ladbrokes can do better!

Want the right results…

… ask the right questions!

I don’t know if you’ve noticed but companies seem to have forgotten the art of gathering the right data.

And this is an easy way to customer dissatisfaction.

I was on the wrong end of this recently when I was looking to renew my car insurance.

My current provider hit me with a renewal quote that’s almost 50% higher than last year!

Now, I’m no speed demon and nothing has happened on the roads in the past year to justify such a steep increase.

So, I did some good old comparison shopping.

Lo and behold, I come upon a quote that’s a whopping £75 cheaper!

Great, so I start filling out those online forms on their website.

As I’m diligently reviewing the information they have about me, I come across a question: “How many cars are there in your household?”

3 was ticked, which was true back when my stepson lived with us.

But times have changed, and it’s just two of us now.

So, I adjust the answer, thinking this could potentially lower my quote. But wait for it… my quote shoots up by nearly £12! What in the world?

Naturally, I wanted to know why.

When I rang them here’s what they said:

Apparently, the fewer cars there are in the household, the more I’ll be driving mine.

So more time on the road equals a higher risk of incidents and claims.

I can see that logic, except for one tiny detail—they assumed I had access to my stepson’s car, which I didn’t because, well, I wasn’t insured for it!

You see they made a wrong assumption because they asked the wrong question.

If they’d asked, “How many cars do you have access to?” instead of the misleading “How many cars are there in your household?”, they wouldn’t have gone down a rabbit hole of flawed risk assessment.

Sadly, they didn’t see things my way, so I took my business elsewhere.

This whole episode serves as a timely reminder: When you’re collecting data, it’s absolutely crucial to ask the right questions!

You’ll get the right answers that will lead you to better decisions and happier customers.

Bob made a small error…

… which you can avoid

Promoting new products and services can be challenging, right?

Choosing the right channel for your business, audience, and offerings is no easy task.

A popular option is email marketing—it’s cost-effective and allows you to reach a wide audience.

You can create captivating copy tailored to engage your ideal clients.

But wait! Before hitting that “SEND” button, remember the rules.

Let me tell you about Bob.

Bob is the CEO of a thriving tech company specialising in solutions for other businesses.

His marketing team gathered to brainstorm ideas for promoting a new service they’d developed.

One suggestion caught their attention: sending an email to their loyal clients and suppliers, treating them to exclusive offers and discounts.

It sounded like a brilliant way to reach their entire network, so they crafted a compelling email and eagerly pressed “SEND”.

However, instead of the positive feedback and requests for more info they expected, they received complaints from some of the recipients asking, “Why have I received this email?”

The marketing list included clients and suppliers without considering their business types.

While it’s acceptable to send marketing emails to individuals associated with limited companies without their prior consent, the same cannot be said for sole traders. As unincorporated businesses, they are treated similarly to consumers and require prior permission to receive such emails.

Bob swiftly took responsibility for the mistake, sincerely apologised to the affected individuals, and promptly removed their details from the email marketing list.

Determined to avoid similar mishaps in the future, he implemented stronger procedures and provided training to his team on compliance.

Fortunately, the repercussions for Bob’s company were not severe this time, but it reminds us that we need to know and apply the rules properly in our businesses.

If you’re unsure or want to discuss legal compliance in your marketing, you know who to ask, don’t you?

A definite winner…

… well maybe 😂

One fine morning, as my husband and I were on our morning walk, inspiration struck me like a ray of sunlight.

A thought so brilliant, it could revolutionize the world of gardening! 🤔

Picture this: a duvet…for plants! I know it sounds peculiar, but bear with me.

Amidst our conversation about the state of our vegetable garden, brimming with onions, garlic, broad beans, squash, and courgettes, we’ve encountered a minor setback—the runner beans.

Although we planted them a tad late, they seemed to be catching up, flourishing in their own way…until the unexpected chill arrived.

In a typical summer, these sprightly beans would have raced up their canes, adorning them with lush green foliage.

Alas, the sudden drop in temperature seemed to displease them greatly.

If they had the gift of speech, I’m certain they’d grumble about their chilly roots! 🙃

And that’s when it hit me: the plant duvet! A cosy cover to keep those delicate roots warm and snug.

Now, I must confess, this idea may not be my greatest gardening brainchild. I’m more of a dabbler in the world of horticulture.

However, fear not! When it comes to marketing and advertising compliance, I’m your go-to expert, offering invaluable guidance and assistance.

A fine line…

… but an important one

Isn’t it amazing how sports, especially football, captivate the hearts of so many young fans? I remember my husband telling me about when he and his brothers were young, cheering for Manchester United (their dad’s team 😉) during exciting matches on TV.

But those famous football players can have an influence on young people, and we need to be careful if these stars are used to promote some services, like gambling for example.

The ASA, therefore, has some strict rules. They don’t want ads featuring sports stars who strongly appeal to those under 18, which makes sense.

So, when it comes to football, the ASA sees it as a high-risk area because of its popularity among the young. That’s why they’re unhappy about players from top British and European clubs featuring in gambling ads. But when it comes to other sports like boxing, which is more adult-oriented, this issue doesn’t arise.

Let me tell you about two recent cases that highlight this.

In one case, an ad featured FC Barcelona players Jordi Alba and Sergio Busquets.

You may know how huge Barcelona is and these players are not only famous within the club but also in the Spanish national team, and they’re well-known even here in the UK.

They’ve played in major tournaments that received huge media coverage.

That’s why the ASA consider them high-risk and upheld the complaint against the ad.

On the flip side, we have the case of boxer Chris Eubank Jr.

Boxing, as we know, has a more adult fanbase and the data showed that most of the viewers for his matches were adults too.

Although Eubank Jr appeared on Celebrity Gogglebox with his dad, a popular show for all ages on Channel 4, he doesn’t have a huge following of under-18s on social media.

So, the ASA concluded that the ad for his upcoming match didn’t strongly appeal to young people.

The real difference is the pull of various sports for young people. Promoting a gambling product or service can be done legally, you just need to know the rules and apply them.

Or speak to someone that does. 😊

A taste of independence 🍄

Shame it was on Sunday mornings!

I was brought up in a little town in Buckinghamshire.

 At the age of thirteen, I landed my first “real” job at a mushroom farm (I had a paper round before this but that wasn’t what I considered a real job)

Every Sunday morning, I would wake up early, (I have since learnt to enjoy Sunday morning lie-ins), and my poor dad would drive me up to the farm to spend the morning picking mushrooms.

It wasn’t the best job, in dark, damp sheds filling box after box with the lovely white fungi, but there was a reason for this.

I wanted to earn my own money, to be able to buy the things I wanted without relying on my parents.

The mushroom farm gave me that opportunity and was my first taste of independence.

With each passing Sunday, I got a taste of what was to become: earning my own money.

But it wasn’t just about the money; it was the sense of achievement and the freedom to make my own choices.

Building on my parent’s teaching about the importance of saving, budgeting and setting goals for the things I wanted to buy.

And I have continued to do this in my professional life, first working for someone else and now in my own business, guiding my clients through the intricate web of marketing and advertising regulation.

I help them promote their products and services confidently, without worrying about legal consequences.

That’s my job!

Why?

They should know better!

Lots of businesses do this without realising it’s actually against the law!

And you know what?

It also drives away real customers.

When it comes to sending emails, many businesses break the rules, sometimes through lack of knowledge but others because they don’t care how they treat their customers.

I was talking to a client who signed up for a free webinar.

But guess what?

He got bombarded with seven marketing emails on the very first day!

Why? Because the sign-up form made him agree to get those emails, just to attend the webinar.

I’ve seen this so many times.

Having to agree to receive emails to download a client magnet or attend a free event, but you know what?

It’s not just against the law, it’s also a really bad way to start a relationship with potential customers.

It’s not honest, and it doesn’t respect their right to decide how you use their information.

If you follow the rules, which means receiving marketing is a real choice and your offer is good, you’ll attract potential customers who actually want to hear from you.

And the best part?

They’re more likely to become paying customers.

Because they’ll trust you.

One more reason to follow the rules.